Nikola Beim
Independent Researcher
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6669-2869

 

Volume 10, April 2026

Abstract                                                                                                                                                                                            The article examines an anamnesis of the inaugural axiological study of monuments as defined in The Modern Cult of Monuments: Its Character and Origin by Austrian art historian Alois Riegl, originally published in 1903. It traces the influence of this seminal work and examines its effects on architecture in the twentieth century in English-speaking countries. During this period, rediscoveries of Riegl’s work have inspired multiple authors and movements to offer new interpretations. What has driven Riegl’s most prominent comeback, or series of comebacks, is not only the publication of new translations since the 1980s but the discovery of new dimensions that repositioned his work in new contexts when dealing with architectural ruins and monument values. Riegl claimed that monument values vary over time, making him much at home in the period of postmodernism during the 1970s and 1980s as in his own time. Postmodernism, with its critique of universality and embrace of pluralistic historical narratives, further amplified the applicability of Riegl’s axiological study, particularly in its alignment with the multiplicity of meanings inherent in cultural heritage. Riegl’s concept of monuments values changing over time not only challenged static interpretations of historical objects but also provided a dynamic methodology for engaging with the temporal, material, and cultural complexities of monuments. In doing so, his legacy remains a pivotal reference point for architectural historians and preservationists navigating the interplay of memory, identity, and historical continuity in an evolving socio-cultural landscape.

Keywords                                                                                                                                                                                      Alois Riegl, monument, preservation, value, postmodernism

[pdf]

Bibliography

Allais, Lucia and Pop, Andrei, ‘Mood for Modernists: An Introduction to Three Riegl Translations’, in Grey Room, 80 (2020), 6–25.

Allais, Lucia, Designs of Destruction: The Making of Monuments in the Twentieth Century (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2018).

Arrhenius, Thordis, Fragile Monument on Conservation and Modernity (London: Artifice, 2012).

Arrhenius, Thordis, ‘The Cult of Age in Mass-Society: Alois Riegl’s Theory of Conservation’, in Future Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation, History, Theory, and Criticism, 1(1) (2004), 75–81.

Bédard, Jean-François, Cities of artificial excavation: The work of Peter Eisenman: 1978-1988 (Montréal: Canadian Centre for Architecture, 1994).

Carpo, Mario, ‘The Postmodern Cult of Monuments’, in Future Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation, History, Theory, and Criticism, 4 (2) (2007), 50–60.

Colomina, Beatriz and Wigley, Mark, Are we human? The Archaeology of Design (Zürich, Switzerland: Lars Müller Publishers, 2016).

Colquhoun, Alan, Modernity and the Classical Tradition: Architectural Essays 1980-1987 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991).

Derrida, Jacques, Writing and difference (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1967).

Elsner, Jaś, ‘Alois Riegl and Classical Archaeology’, in Alois Riegl Revisited: Beiträge Zu Werk Und Rezeption (Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften; MAK, 2010).

Forster, Kurt W. ‘Aby Warburg’s History of Art: Collective Memory and the Social Mediation of Images’ in Daedalus, 105, no. 1 (1976), 169–76.

Forster, Kurt W. ‘Die Ruine als Nachklang, Vorbild oder Zukunftsbotin’, in Ruinierte Öffentlichkeit (2012), 183–207.

Forster, Kurt W. ‘Monument/Memory and the Mortality of Architecture’, in Oppositions, 25 (1982).

Förster, Kim, Building Institution (Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 2024).

Gombrich, Ernst H., Aby Warburg: An Intellectual Biography, with a Memoir of the History of the Library by R Saxl (London: Warburg Institute, 1970; 2d ed., Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1986).

Hell, Julia and Schönle, Andreas, Ruins of Modernity (Durham: Duke University Press, 2010).

Huyssen, Andreas, ‘Authentic Ruins, Products of Modernity’, in Ruins of Modernity (Durham: Duke University Press, 2010).

Isar, Yudhishthir Raj. The Challenge to Our Cultural Heritage: Why Preserve the Past: Proceedings of a Conference on Cultural Preservation, 8-10 April 1984, Washington, DC (Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1986).

Ockman, Joan, ‘Resurrecting the Avant-Garde: The History and Program of Oppositions’, in Architectureproduction (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1988).

Price, Nicholas, Talley, M. Kirby, and Melucco-Vaccaro, Alessandra. Historical and Philosophical Issues in the Conservation of Cultural Heritage (Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute, 1996).

Riegl, Alois, ‘The Modern Cult of Monuments: Its Character and Its Origin’, trans. by Kurt Forster and Diane Ghirardo, in Oppositions, 25 (1982), 21–56.

Tschudi-Madsen, Stephan, ‘Architectural Conservation: The Triumph of an Idea’, in The Challenge to Our Cultural Heritage: Why Preserve the Past, edited by Yudhishthir Raj Isar. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1986.

Werckmeister, Otto Karl, ‘Walter Benjamin, Paul Klee, and the Angel of History’, in Oppositions, 25 (1982).

 

The Edgar Wind Journal 10: 118-132, 2026
DOI: 10.53245/EWJ-000062
Copyright: © 2026 N. Beim. This is an open access, peer-reviewed article published by Bernardino Branca