David Castriota
Department of Art History, Sarah Lawrence College
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3701-8253

 

Volume 10, April 2026

Abstract                                                                                                                                                                                            Among the many groundbreaking theoretical and methodological innovations that Alois Riegl contributed to the modern discipline of Art History, one of the more original and perhaps unexpected was his effort to foreground the role of ornamental or decorative arts within the larger context of artistic production. Riegl understood ornament or decorative art to be an integral component or facet of all artistic production, one that shared the same aesthetic principles, the same underlying qualities of formal structure, organization, and taste discernible in painting, sculpture or architecture, despite any differences in medium, technique, scale or content. Although his scholarly trajectory came to encompass various areas, Riegl’s initial publications were on textiles and carpets produced in the Near East and Egypt, and they appear to constitute the earliest discussions of such works as historical objects. Riegl’s Altorientalische Teppiche boldly attempted to trace the origins of Islamic carpet weaving and its ornamental design repertory back into the art of the ancient Near East. Riegl would then apply this notion of historical continuity more broadly to ancient and medieval decorative arts across the Mediterranean and western Asia in his study Stilfragen, where again he demonstrated such continuity across various media. Later, in Die spätrömische Kunst-Industrie he would develop the concept of Kunstwollen to show how late Roman decorative or ornamental arts manifested the same new visual properties discernible in various other media, to explain the artistic transformations of late antiquity as a positive development. While not restricting himself to the study of ornament, Riegl nonetheless returned constantly to this theme, which surely held a special place in his intellectual outlook, and quite probably in his own personal taste. But above all he strove constantly to situate the appreciation of ornament within a larger historical continuum.

Keywords                                                                                                                                                                                      Alois Riegl, Ornament, History

[pdf]

Bibliography

Adams, Debra Noel, Late Antique, Migration Period and Early Byzantine Garnet Cloisonné Ornaments: Origins, Styles and Workshop Production, Ph.D. Thesis (London: University College, 1991).

Adams, Noel, ‘The Development of Early Garnet Inlaid Ornaments’, in Kontakte zwischen Iran, Byzanz, und der Steppe in 6.-7. Jh.. Varia Acta Archaeologia Hungarica, ed. by Cs. Bálint, 9 (2000), 13–70.

Albenda, Pauline, ‘Assyrian Carpets in Stone’, in Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society, 10 (1978), 1–19.

Arrhenius, Birgit, Merovingian Gold and Garnet Jewellery: Emergence and Social Implications (Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell International, 1985).

Aslanapa, Oktay, One Thousand Years of Turkish Carpets, editor/English text by William A. Edmonds (Istanbul: Eren Yayıncılı ve Kitapçılık, 1988).

Basu, Priyanka, ‘Ideal and Material Ornament: Rethinking the “Beginnings” and History of Art’, in Journal of Art Historiography, 9 (December 2013), 1–31.

Binstock, Benjamin, ‘Alois Riegl, Monumental Ruin: Why We still Need to Read Historical Grammar of the Visual Arts’, forward to Alois Riegl, Historical Grammar of the Visual Arts, trans. by E. Jung (New York: Zone Books, 2004).

Bode, Wilhelm von, Mein Leben (Berlin: Hermann Reckendorf, 1930).

Böhme, Horst Wolfgang, Die spätantiken Gürtel mit Kerbschnittverzierten Metallbeschlägen: Studien zur Militargürteln des 4.-5. Jahrhunderts (Mainz: Verlag des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums, 2020.

Bogolyubov, A.A., Kovry Sredneĭ Azii (The Carpets of Central Asia) (St. Petersburg: Ekspeditsiia zagotovleniia gosudarstvennykh bumag, 1908–1909).

Ehringhaus, Sibylle, Germanenmythos und deutsche Identität: Die Frühmittelalter-Rezeption in Deutschland 18421933 (Berlin: Verlag und Datenbank für Geisteswissenschaften, 1996).

Elsner, Jaś, ‘Alois Riegl: Art History and the Beginning of Late Antique Studies as a Discipline,’ in The New Late Antiquity: A Gallery of Intellectual Portraits, ed. by Clifford Ando and Marco Formisano (Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, 2021), pp. 167–182.

Friedrich, Matthias, Image and Ornament in the Early Medieval West: New Perspectives on Post-Roman Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023).

Friedrich, Matthias, and James M. Harland (eds), Interrogating the Germanic: A Category and its Use in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages (Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2021).

Graham Reynolds, Diana, Alois Riegl and the Politics of Art History: Intellectual Traditions and Austrian Identity in Fine-de-Siècle Vienna, Ph.D. Thesis (San Diego: University of California, 1997).

Halsall, Guy, Cemeteries and Societies in Merovingian Gaul: Selected Studies in History and Archaeology, 1992–2009 (Leiden: Brill, 2010).

Iversen, Margaret, Alois Riegl: Art History and Theory (Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press, 1993).

Jones, Siân, The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and the Present (London and New York: Routledge, 1997).

Karl, Barbara, ‘Carpets and Empire: The 1891 Exhibition at the Handelsmuseum in Vienna’, in À l’orientale: Collecting, Displaying and Appropriating Islamic Art and Architecture in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries, ed. by F. Giese et al. (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2020), pp. 111–123.

Lessing, Julius, Alt Orientalische Teppichmuster nach bildern und originalen des XVXVI. Jahrhunderts (Berlin: Ernst Wasmuth, 1877).

MacMullen, Ramsay, ‘The Celtic Renaissance’, in Historia, 14 (January 1965), 93–104.

Olin, Margaret, Forms of Representation in Alois Riegl’s Theory of Art (University Park Pa: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992).

Olin, Margaret, ‘Alois Riegl: The Late Roman Empire in the Late Habsburg Empire,’ in The Habsburg Legacy: National Identity in Historical Perspective, ed. by Ritchie Robertson and Edward Timms (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1994), pp. 107–120.

Rahmani, L.Y., ‘Chip-Carving in Palestine’, in Israel Exploration Journal, 38(1/2) (1988), 59–75.

Rampley, Matthew, The Vienna School of Art History: Empire and the Politics of Scholarship, 1847–1918 (University Park PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2013).

Reynolds Cordileone, Diana, Alois Riegl in Vienna 18751905: An Institutional Biography (Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 2014).

Riegl, Alois, Die ägyptischen Textilfunde im k.k. Österreichishen Museum: Allgemeine Charakteristik und Katalog (Vienna: Verlage R.V. Waldheim, 1889).

Riegl, Altorientalische Teppiche (Leipzig: T.O. Weigel Nachfolger, 1891).

Riegl, Alois, ‘Zur Geschichte des Orientalischen Teppichs,’ in Katalog der Ausstellung orientalischer Teppiche (Vienna: Verlag des k. k. österreichischen Handelsmuseums, 1891), pp. 11–23.

Riegl, Alois, Stilfragen: Grundlegungen zu einer Geschichte der Ornamentik. First edition (Berlin: Georg Siemens, 1893).

Riegl, Alois, Die spätrömische Kunst-Industrie nach den Funden in Österreich-Ungarn (Vienna: Druck und Verlag der österreichischen Staatsdruckerei, 1901).

Riegl, Alois, ‘Die altgermanische Thierornamentik: Typologische Studie über germanische Metallgegenstände aus dem IV. bis IX. Jahrhundert, nebst einer Studie über irische Ornamentik, Stockholm, 1904’, in Göttingen gelehrte Anzeiger, 3 (1905), 228–236.

Riegl, Alois, Die spätrömische Kunst-Industrie, nach den Funden in Österreich-Ungarn. Teil. II. Kunstgewerbe des frühen Mittelalters auf Grundlage des nachgelassesen Materials Alois Riegl, bearbeitet von E. Heinrich Zimmermann (Vienna: Druck und Verlag der österreichischen Staatsdrukerei, 1923).

Riegl, Alois, Late Roman Art Industry, trans. by Rolf Winkes (Rome: G. Bretschneider, 1985).

Riegl, Alois, Problems of Style: Foundations for a History of Ornament, trans. by Evelyn Kain (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992).

Ritter von Hartel, Wilhelm, and Franz Wickhoff, Die Wiener Genesis (Prague, Vienna, and Leipzig: F. Tempsky, 1895).

Rudenko, Sergei I., The Frozen Tombs of Siberia, trans. by M.W. Thompson (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1970).

Rummel, Philipp von, Habitus barbarus: Kleidung und Repräsentation spätantiken Elite im 4. und 5.Jahrhundert (Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2007).

Ryuk, Sohee, ‘Patterns and Collections: Carpets from Central Asia in the Imperial Russian Imagination’, Acta Via Serica, 7(2) (December 2022), 65–88.

Semper, Gottfried, Der Stil in den technischen und tektonischen Künsten oder praktische Aesthetik. Ein Handbuch für Techniker, Künstler und Kunstfreund. Bd. 1, Textile Kunst (Munich: Friedrich Bruckmann’s Verlag, 1860).

Simakov, Nikolai E., Iskusstvo Srednei Azii: Sbornik sredne-aziatskoj ornamentacii (L’art de l’Asie centrale: Receuil de l’art décoratif de l’Asie centrale) (St. Petersburg: Tipografiia V. Kirshbauma, 1882).

Swift, Ellen, Style and Function in Roman Decoration: Living with Objects and Interiors (Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 2009).

Teece, Denise-Marie, ‘Through the Renaissance Frame: Carpets and the Beginnings of “Islamic Art” in Nineteenth-Century Vienna and Berlin’, in The Textile Museum Journal, 44 (2017), 47–69.

Wells, Peter, The Barbarians Speak: How the Conquered Peoples Shaped Roman Europe (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999).

Wood, Christopher, ‘Riegl’s “Mache”’, in Anthropology and Aesthetics, 46 (Autumn, 2004), 154–172.

 

 

The Edgar Wind Journal 10: 24-40, 2026
DOI: 10.53245/EWJ-000057
Copyright: © 2026 D. Castriota. This is an open access, peer-reviewed article published by Bernardino Branca